Page 703 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 703

demand decreases of more than 70%. During   for icebreakers and natural gas carriers due   intrinsically related to the country’s econom-  credit objects are included as likely to be
 this period, the Russian shipbuilding sector,   to their exploration objectives in the Arctic re-  ic cycles. Thus, according to Barat, Campos   covered by the financing offered.
 which is also dominated by state-owned   gion. Currently one of the largest companies   Neto and Paula (2014), in the period from   The FMM is an accounting fund that relies
 companies, deserves to be highlighted. Con-  in the country is the United Shipbuilding Cor-  1880 to 1930, the development of port infra-  on resources from the following sources: (i)
 trary to the global downward trend, the   poration (USC), created in 2007 and owned   structure was closely related to the country’s   percentage on the collection of the Additional
 country’s shipyards have seen an increase in   by the government. The sector is dependent   export efforts. However, at that time, there   Freight for the Renewal of the Merchant Ma-
 their production due to government demand   on the military demands of the State (Idem).  was no policy dedicated to the naval industry.  rine (AFRMM); (ii) budget allocations in the
                     According  to  D’Avila and  Bridi  (2017),   General Budget of the Union; (iii) amounts
 Figure 3 - New contracts in Russian shipyards by ship type
 and by shipowner location, 2018-2019  it was only in the 1950s that the naval in-  and amounts allocated by law, product of
                   dustry began to receive government atten-  the return on financing operations granted;
 (a) Ship type  (b) Owner location  tion, with its inclusion in the Goals Plan.   (iv) other income from financial investments .
                                                                                                 2
                   And, only at the end of the 1960s, specific   It is currently managed by the Ministry of In-
 Gas Carrier  56,4%  actions began to exist aimed at this indus-  frastructure and the Board of Directors of the
 Other Dry  17,8%  try, as stated by Amaral, Gomide and Pires
 Cargo  Russia  99,1%                                       Merchant Marine Fund. During the period of
 Tanker  11,6%     (2014); D’Avila and Bridi (2017); and Sina-  existence of the FMM, it underwent several
 Icebreaker  6,3%  val (n/d), with the Shipbuilding Emergency   modifications, the last one occurring with the
 Passenger  3,9%   Plan (1969/1970) and the Shipbuilding Pro-  approval of Law 13,401, of 01/07/2022, also
 Offshore  2,8%    grams (1970 to 1980). As defined in Pires,   known as BR do Mar.
 Service  Unknow 0,9%
 Dredger  0,7%     Gomide and Amaral (2014a, p. 188-189)    3.3. The shipping industry in the
 Others  0,4%          “[...] the naval industry comprises the   1970s
                       activity of manufacturing vessels and
                       water transport vehicles in general,   During the 1970s, Brazil was relatively
 Source: OCDE (2021b, p. 32)                                successful in the performance of its naval
                       ranging from maritime support vessels,
 Thus, it is important to highlight how   scope of state-owned companies leading   port, oil tankers, bulk carriers, contain-  industry, serving 4% of the world market,
                                                            according  to  Amaral,  Gomide  and  Pires
 the dominance of the international sce-  the production ranking, and in govern-  er carriers and river convoys to the   (2014), in addition to employing around
 nario in the shipbuilding industry under-  ment subsidy policies. Despite the impact   construction of shipyards, platforms   40,000 people. This industry was based
 went a gradual shift from Europe to Asia.   suffered by the Covid-19 pandemic, the   and drilling rigs for offshore oil produc-  on foreign technology: Japanese, Dutch,
 This change, not only in terms of the   industry has been slowly rebuilding itself   tion, in addition to the entire ship parts   German and English, but it had a high per-
 economy, also represents a change in the   through government measures to protect   supply network”.  centage of nationalization, approaching
 structure of world competition, with the   and encourage its industries.  60%. Thus, what characterizes this period
                   3.2. The Merchant Marine Fund (FMM)
 3. History of Shipbuilding in Brazil                       of production success are the internation-
                     In 1958, the Merchant Marine Fund -    al orders, when Brazil came to occupy the
 3.1. The beginning of the naval   shipyard  in  the country.  This undertaking,   FMM was created, through Law 3,381.   second place in the world orders.
 industry in Brazil
 which did not count on public investment,   The initiative addresses the financing of   However, with the world economic crisis
 The first action of industrial thinking in   was responsible for a third of the armada   various activities related to the naval in-  of 1980, the market lost strength and not
 the naval sector was the initiative of Baron   in the war against Paraguay (SINAVAL, n/d).  dustry, such as the construction and acqui-  even the government’s efforts with the Sec-
 of Mauá who, in 1846, founded, in Niterói,   From an analysis of the literature dedicat-  sition of vessels and shipyards. According   ond Shipbuilding Program of 1981 were
 the Establishment of Foundry and Shipyards   ed to the subject, it is possible to observe that   to the development of the industry, the   able to maintain the country’s production
 of Ponta d’Areia , also known as the first   investments in the Brazilian naval industry are   fund’s regulations are modified, and new   (D’AVILA; BRIDI, 2017; PIRES; GOMIDE;
 1

 700  BLUE ECONOMY                                                                    Brazilian Naval Industry 701
   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708