Page 265 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 265

also configured as a technical-scientific dis-  Dimension of the Environment held in Stock-  milestone was established by the creation of   sector, which increasingly focuses on the is-
 cipline that is primarily concerned with the   holm was a catalyst for the creation of the   the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Com-  sue of interconnectivity of activities exclusively
 relationship between society and the CZ. In   United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).  mission (IOC – UNESCO), still in 1960, and   marine (oil and gas, aquaculture, navigation,
 addition, other elements are the focus of its   UNEP leveraged the dissemination of oth-  until today it is the only organization with   marine conservation, etc.) with their bases
 analysis as a discipline, such as the applica-  er initiatives of the same character, but with   competence to deal with matters related to   on land (ports, refineries, ecosystem services,
 tion  of  participatory  management  models,   territorial specificities and their own purpos-  marine sciences in the UN system.  etc.). All this interdependence between pro-
 the search for integrated knowledge, insti-  es. One example is the adoption of the In-  In Brazil, the consequences of these   ductive sectors, logistics, infrastructure, and
 tutional cooperation and coordination, and   ternational Convention for the Prevention of   movements led to the creation, in 1974, of   ecosystem services is configured as a central
 dissemination of results in management pro-  Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), which took   the Interministerial Commission for the Re-  point in the discussion of a Blue Economy.
 cesses (BARRAGÁN, 2016; BARRAGÁN; DE   place shortly after the Stockholm meeting   sources of the Sea (CIRM), whose objective   4.1 Management policies and
 ANDRÉS, 2020). Such conceptions, when   (NICOLODI; GRUBER, 2020). A reference   is to govern the discussions on the subject.   instruments in the coastal zone
 added together, contribute to the notion of   point for Integrated Coastal Management   A direct consequence of the creation of this   of Brazil
 “coastal governance”, which is defined by   as a public policy was the US Coastal Zone   Commission was the enactment, in 1980, of
 Polette (2020) as a more comprehensive sys-  Management Act, also enacted in 1972 in   the National Policy for Sea Resources (PNRM)   The Art. 7 of Federal Decree 5.300/2004
 tem than a management system, not limited   the United States.  (MARRONI; SILVA, 2015). In 1983, within   brings in its scope the need to apply, in an
 to the governmental sphere.  This initiative can be considered a man-  the scope of the same Commission, a spe-  articulated and integrated way, a set of nine
 These complementary visions form a set   agement instrument that established the   cific subcommittee was created to deal with   instruments. Evidently, the meaning of this
 of what can be considered Integrated Coast-  collaborative and voluntary management of   coastal management,  and which can be con-  articulated and integrated application is a
 al Management: a management process   the CZ at the federal and state levels, cover-  sidered as the embryo of what would become   widely debated issue and presents several
 directly linked to the State, which requires   ing almost the entire coast of that country   the Coastal Management Integration Group   biases according to the interests of those
 effective social participation and technical   (HUMPHREY et al., 2000). For many west-  (GI-GERCO), established in 1996 and with   who participate in such debate. Even so,
 and scientific support, the latter of which can   ern nations, this was a milestone in the dis-  significant performance until 2019, when it   the importance of such instruments being
 be found in the various lines of research. in   cussion, then incipient, of the planning of   had  its importance  and  representativeness   clearly and concisely defined in the legisla-
 Universities and Research Centers around the   coastal spaces and their public and private   significantly reduced (SANTOS et al., 2019).  tion related to the subject is undeniable.
 planet (NICOLODI, 2021).  management agenda.  Since 1988, the year of the implementa-  Table 1 is a summary of the most rele-
 In the case of Brazil, Polette (2020) con-  There were several historical moments   tion of the ICM policy in Brazil, to the pres-  vant management tools in the ICM process
 siders that the National Coastal Manage-  where the need to implement a manage-  ent day, the economic, socio-environmental,   in Brazil. A superficial reading focused only
 ment Plan – PNGC enables full governance   ment of coastal spaces areas that respected   technological and management context of   on the scope of these instruments leads to
 of the CZ, through a broad articulation of   their specificities was observed. A highlight   the Brazilian CZ has gradually changed, and   the perception of a logical chain, with the
 public policies (sectoral, environmental, and   can be given to Eco-92, which took place   the response given by policies and their in-  definition of plans in the three spheres of
 urban) aimed at optimizing the develop-  in Rio de Janeiro, where the mention of   struments has not always been compatible   government (federal, state, and munici-
 ment potential that such spaces represent,   this need was highlighted in Chapter 17 of   with their objectives. An important update in   pal) and with their execution coordinated
 and validate the instruments of public poli-  Agenda 21. Other important moments were   this whole context was the migration of in-  by a broader Federal Action Plan (PAF),
 cies, as key elements of territorial manage-  materialized in the creation of the Intergov-  terests, definitions, policies, and instruments   further complemented by monitoring and
 ment, thus allowing their implementation   ernmental Committee for the Framework   increasingly towards offshore.  data analysis systems (NICOLODI; GRUBER,
 within the scope of governance.  of the Convention on Climate Change, the   The indisputable interaction between the   2020; NICOLODI, 2021).
 To understand how the PNGC was con-  Intergovernmental Committee on Biological   CZ and the ocean becomes a central issue,   In  addition, two  instruments  comple-
 ceived, it is necessary to analyze some chrono-  Diversity, the Intergovernmental Panel on Cli-  whether from the point of view of the en-  ment this framework: the ORLA Project,
 logical facts, such as the year 1972, where the   mate Change (IPCC), at RIO+10, at RIO+20,   vironments (ecosystems and associated en-  which operates on a local scale, with a
 United Nations Conference on the Human   among many others. Another important   vironmental services) or of the productive   focus on social participation (OLIVEIRA;



 262   BLUE ECONOMIY                                                   The management of the Coastal Zone of Brazil  263
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270