Page 286 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 286

4. The economic bias of marine pollution: a shared responsibility for all                                            Traditional maritime industries will be   ecosystem services. Of the world’s coun-
                                                                                                                                 increasingly influenced by climate change,   tries, however, 20% are at risk of their
                  The ocean is governed by legal struc-  mining the economic viability of the econ-                              as changes in temperature, ocean acidity   ecosystems collapsing due to the decline
               tures at the international, national, state,   omy of the sea. In addition to the damage                          and sea level rise affect the movements of   in  biodiversity  and  related  beneficial  ser-
               and local levels and, similarly, regulations   to the environment and human health, the                           fish stocks, opening up new trade routes   vices. This strong economic dependence
               on marine pollution are enacted. Sever-  negative impacts resulting from the release                              and affecting port structures, thus creat-  on natural resources highlights the funda-
               al multilateral and bilateral treaties are in   of plastic waste into the ocean, for example,                     ing new destinations and tourist attrac-  mental character of sustainable develop-
               force, in addition to other agreements for   are reflected in the world economy. It is esti-                      tions, while others are destroyed. It is   ment and conservation for the long-term
               fisheries management, maritime transport,   mated that about 4.8 to 12.7 million metric                           noteworthy that the destruction of the   sustainability of world economies (SWISS
               protection of biodiversity and pollution   tons of plastic were released into the ocean                           Aral Sea, for example, caused economic   RE INSTITUTE, Op. Cit.).
               (WEIS, Op. Cit., p.16).                  from terrestrial sources in 2010 alone, and                              collapse and mass migration from the sur-   In terms of loss valuation, it is possible
                  The interactions of society, the economy   forecasts regarding the flow of plastics into                       rounding coastal area, which provides an   to estimate that a decline of just 1% to
               and the environment exert an important in-  the marine environment point to its increase                          extreme view of how the collapse of an   5% in the provision of marine ecosystem
               fluence on marine ecosystems through their   over the years (BEAUMONT, 2019).                                     ecosystem can affect the  local economy   services is equivalent to an annual loss of
               dynamics and their broader biogeochemical   Plastic waste, specifically, has the poten-                           (SWISS RE INSTITUTE, 2022).              500 to 2,500 billion dollars in the value
               cycle. This is because ecosystem services are   tial to work together with other stressors,                          Conjectures  about  the  reduction  of   of  benefits  derived  from  these  services.
               dependent on each other and exhibit com-  such as climate change and the overex-                                  terrestrial ecosystem services due to an-  Given that  this  figure only includes the
               plex interactions that generate trade-offs in   ploitation of marine resources, in ways that                      thropogenic disturbances point to a de-  impacts  of  marine  natural  capital,  the
               the delivery of one ecosystem service versus   cause much greater damage than if they                             cline of 11% to 28% of them (BEAU-       total economic cost is likely to be much
               the delivery of others. For the ocean econ-  occurred in isolation. Habitat changes in                            MONT,  Op. Cit.). Understanding the      higher (BEAUMONT,  Op. Cit.). By com-
               omy, this is relevant because these inter-  key coastal ecosystems caused by the di-                              concept of ecosystem services is, thus,   parison, the global plastics market in
               actions indirectly determine the viability of   rect impacts of marine litter and plastics                        essential for it to be possible to assimi-  2020 was estimated to be around $580
               ocean-based industries (OECD, 2016).     affect local food production and damage                                  late the magnitude  of the economic      billion, which is less than the monetary
                  According to the Organization for Eco-  coastal structures, leading to far-reaching                            problem that involves marine plastic pol-  value of marine natural capital losses per
               nomic Co-operation and Development       and unpredictable consequences, includ-                                  lution, consequently, affecting all sectors   year. (UNEP, Op. Cit.).
               (OECD), the ocean can be considered as   ing loss of resilience to extreme events                                 of society. Ecosystem services, or environ-  This calculation of the economic costs
               the new economic frontier. These maritime   and climate change in coastal communi-                                mental services, can be defined as flows   per ton of plastic in the ocean  is funda-
                                                                                                                                                                                                      12
               spaces have great potential for growth,   ties (UNEP, 2021).                                                      from natural capital stocks that combine   mental for future global negotiations in
               employment, and innovation. Therefore,      The productivity, viability, profitability                            with human services capital to provide   order to transform the way plastics are
               it is already considered an environment   and safety of the fisheries and aquaculture                             well-being to populations. Such services   designed, produced, used, reused and re-
               of crucial importance to face many of the   industry are highly vulnerable to the impact                          can be classified into four categories: cul-  processed, bearing in mind that the ocean
               challenges that the world has faced and   of plastic deposited in the ocean, especially                           tural services (aesthetic and recreational   economy is essential for the future of hu-
               will face in the coming decades, especially   when coupled with broader factors includ-                           elements); regulation (whether  climate,   man prosperity, and which is an essential
               post-Covid-19, such as: food security, cli-  ing climate change and overfishing. The                              floods, pests, and water purification); sup-  source of food, energy, minerals, health
               mate change, energy production, supply of   high dependence on seafood for nutrition                              port (nutrient cycling and soil formation);   and leisure on which hundreds of millions
               natural resources, in addition to the prog-  leaves the well-being of a significant pro-                          and provision (supply of food, fresh water,   of people depend on (OECD, 2017).
               ress of medicine (OECD, 2017).           portion of the world’s population extremely                              fiber, and fuel) (NUSDEO, 2016).            Marine pollution, therefore, as an event
                  Human activities, however, have the po-  susceptible to any changes in the quanti-                                Over half of the global GDP – that is,   whose consequences are perceived in a
               tential to intervene indirectly in the func-  ty, quality, and safety of this food source                         55%, equivalent to US$41.7 trillion – de-  joint and non-segmented way, mainly due
               tioning of marine ecosystems, thus under-  (BEAUMONT, Op. Cit.).                                                  pends on high-functioning biodiversity and   to  its  transboundary  nature,  enters  the


     284    BLUE ECONOMY                                                                                                                                                                Marine pollution as everyone’s responsibility  285
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291