Page 281 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 281

the sphere of responsibilities in a broad way,   zil, in the South Atlantic basin and in tropical   2. Marine pollution as a transboundary phenomenon: concept and
 being, in fact, a responsibility of all: from the   coastal regions around the world (SOARES   approaches
 individual to the collective.  et al., 2020).
 In this sense, there are several interna-  The fact that marine pollution is a topic   Efforts to provide the scientific basis   by individuals, directly or indirectly, of
 tional legal norms that provide for the re-  addressed in so many spheres of law demon-  for pollution control have been increas-  substances  or energy  into the marine
 sponsibility of States when they cause pol-  strates the magnitude of the phenomenon,   ing, and the law, although permeated by   environment, whose results can turn out in
 lution in the ocean: it is understood that the   as well as justifies the concern and urgency   inadequacies in the scientific understand-  deleterious effects, such as danger to living
 duty of each country is to refrain from the   of the problem, which can manifest itself in   ing of marine pollution, has progressed at   beings and marine life, human health and
 occurrence of this type of damage, especial-  different ways. The international community   national and international levels for some   compromising the quality of seawater use. 4
 ly in order to guarantee that the activities   remains committed to eliminating important   decades now (TOMCZAK, 1984, p. 311-  Reinforcing the transboundary nature
 under its jurisdiction and control are carried   legal gaps, such as the issue of marine plastic   322). This is largely due to the fact that   of marine pollution, more broadly, the phe-
 out with due diligence not to cause pollu-  pollution and the specific approach to micro-  one of the ecosystems in which the impact   nomenon “transboundary pollution” was
 tion to other States and their environment.   plastics, such as the recent negotiations that   of humanity has been felt most severely   the object of international arbitration in the
                                                                                     5
 In Brazilian domestic law, in turn, the Na-  culminated in the UN Resolution “End Plastic   is the marine environment. For long pe-  emblematic Trail Smelter case  of 1941, con-
 tional Plan to Combat Marine Litter was de-  Pollution” (UNITED NATIONS, 2021/2022).  riods, humanity acted as if the ocean, so   sidered as the dispute that established the
 veloped, which is specifically aimed at miti-  This work, therefore, presents reflections   vast and so full of life, could tolerate any   foundations of International Environmental
 gating marine pollution, considering, for its   that range from the concept of marine pollu-  level of pollution thrown into it (POTTERS,   Law with  regard  to transboundary pollu-
 actions, the specificities of each region and   tion and its main origins, to the understand-  2013), but this is not the reality.  tion (HALL, 2007, p. 696). In the arbitration
 location (BRASIL, 2019).  ing of collective responsibility that is charac-  In 1972, the Convention on the Pre-  award, the court, when deciding on an ep-
 It should be noted that in the Brazilian   teristic of the phenomenon, which is translat-  vention of Marine  Pollution by Dumping   isode of air pollution, mentioned a case re-
 case, standards of this nature are becom-  ed into the provisions of various legal mecha-  of Wastes and Other Matter was created;   lated to water pollution, in which the city of
 ing increasingly important, mainly due to   nisms, whether international or national. The   known as the London Convention, it has   New York was subpoenaed, at the request
 the repeated occurrence of oil spills on the   subsistence of legal gaps, however, proves   been in force since 1975. This convention   of the State of New Jersey, to desist from the
 country’s coasts. The substances spilled   to be an important obstacle to the effective   aims to promote the effective control of all   practice of dumping sewage into the sea,
 on the Brazilian coast are varied, the main   approach and mitigation of the problem,  as   sources of marine pollution and to adopt   which was harmful to the applicant’s coastal
 ones  being identified: diesel,  marine fuel,   which, on the other hand, has already been   possible measures to avoid sea pollution   waters in the vicinity of their resorts (UNITED
 oily residue; lubricant; and/or oil. Such spills   duly recognized and has been emphatically   from the release of waste and other ma-  NATIONS; Trail Smelter case. Op. Cit. p.1964).
 may have a known origin, such as those   debated. Although there are several types of   terials (TURRA, 2020, p. 41). The Conven-  Considering the nuances of the case
 from vessels, or they may be orphan spots   marine pollution, the main focus of the re-  tion operates on lists of “waste or other   and the precedents addressed by the court,
 of unknown origin, which makes it difficult   search is on marine pollution from plastics to   matter” classified by their hazardous na-  it was decided that no State has the right
 to identify the volume of spilled oil. These,   Sargassum sp.,  demonstrating how differ-  ture and makes appropriate regulations   to use or permit the use of its territory in
 even in small volumes, occur with an expres-  ent human activities can severely impact the   by reference to the lists. The terms pollu-  a way that causes harm arising from toxic
 sive frequency. This is the profile of most   ocean. It is a theoretical, bibliographical, de-  tion, harmful and dangerous matter, how-  gases in the territory of another State or
 spills that have occurred in the last ten years   scriptive, exploratory and qualitative research   ever, are also invoked, but not defined   in the properties of the persons contained
 in the country: small, but frequent (SILVA,   of national and international bibliography,   (TOMCZAK, 1984, p. 315).  therein. The Arbitral Tribunal reached this
 2019). Yet, in early September 2019, dense   with priority to recently published scientific   The Montego Bay Convention (UN-  conclusion regarding air pollution, but it is
 crude oil began washing up to the beaches   articles, in addition to legislation and inter-  CLOS), ten years later, presented a defini-  equally applicable to water and sea pollu-
                                  3
 of Brazil’s tropical coast. This oil spill was the   national  documents  relevant  to  the  object   tion of pollution  of the marine environ-  tion and is, since then, widely considered
 most extensive and serious environmental   under analysis, especially reports, resolutions   ment,  conceptualizing  it  as  the  type  of   as part of general international law (MEN-
 disaster ever recorded in the history of Bra-  and international conventions.  pollution  resulting  from  the  introduction,   DIS, 2006, p. 11).


 278    BLUE ECONOMY                                                     Marine pollution as everyone’s responsibility  279
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286