Page 218 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 218

binding text, consensually through negoti-  all seas and oceans, in addition to all States.                          When IMO began operations, its main  the request is valid, the Continental Shelf
               ated and egalitarian agreements, covering  Second, this is because of  the  complexity                            concern was to develop international trea-  beyond 200  miles  is approved and the
               the various interests at stake. For these rea-  and scope of its normative text, which man-                       ties and other legislation on safety and pre-  coastal State will have rights to explore and
               sons, the UNCLOS ended up being called  aged to solve historical problems and pre-                                vention of marine pollution. In general, this  exploit the living and non-living natural re-
               the “Constitution of the Oceans”, in our  cisely delimit marine spaces and the rights                             work has been carried out effectively and  sources of this maritime seabed region.
               view, a fair comparison and analogy, with  and duties of countries in their use. Still, and                       the organization currently focusing its ef-  In addition to the Continental Shelf,
               all its limitations that international law itself  not  least  because  of its superior  character                forts on keeping the legislation up to date  the seabed is located beyond national ju-
               has (SCOVAZZI, 2000) 18                 to the other sparse norms, the convention                                 and ensuring ratification by as many States  risdiction, the so-called Area. This zone is
                 Thus, the UNCLOS represented an ex-   overlaps the other existing rules of Law of                               as possible. This has also been achieved  conceptualized in the UNCLOS simply as:
               traordinary evolution in the international  the Sea and creates an environment of inter-                          quite satisfactorily, with several texts that  “Area means the sea ground, the seabed,
               law of the sea and navigation. This is firstly,  national legal security, since everyone knows                    apply to more than 98% of the world’s ton-  and its subsoil beyond the limits of national
               because of its universal character, covering  the law to be applied (BASTOS, Op. Cit.).                           nage  of  merchant  ships.  Currently,  IMO’s  jurisdiction” (UNCLOS, Art. 1, 1).
                                                                                                                                 emphasis is on trying to ensure that these   The UNCLOS does not expressly state
               3. The application of rules at sea and the disputes in their interpretation:                                      conventions and other treaties are properly  what the purposes of the International Sea-
               the institutions and the dispute settlement system at sea                                                         implemented by member states.            bed Authority would be, but it is possible to
                                                                                                                                    On the other hand, when it comes to  derive them from the text. In reality, there
                 Notwithstanding the establishment  of  of the IMO in the UNCLOS: in Article 2                                   seabeds, there are two institutions that reg-  are two purposes of the Authority: to rep-
               the rules relating to the use of maritime  of Annex VIII, which deals with the cre-                               ulate their use and exploitation: the Conti-  resent Humanity – to which all the resourc-
               spaces and marine resources, on several  ation and maintenance of lists of experts                                nental Shelf Limits Commission (CLCS) and  es of the Area belong – and to organize,
               occasions there are divergences in the in-  for international arbitration, and the IMO                            the International Seabed Authority (ISA).  administer and control the activities in this
               terpretation and application of these rules  responsible  for  doing  so  with  regard  to                           The Continental Shelf Limits Commis-  maritime zone.
               by States, which, on many occasions, end  “navigation, including pollution from ves-                              sion has the function of analyzing the      The Authority performs, first of all, a
               up using the dispute settlement system at  sels and by jettisoning” (UNCLOS, Annex                                claims of coastal States on the existence  dual representative function, never be-
               sea created by UNCLOS. In addition, oth-  VIII, Art. 1). However, there is an import-                             or not of a scientific based extended con-  fore configured by any other organization
               er specialized institutions have the task of  ant series of norms in the UNCLOS text in                           tinental shelf. States that believe that their  within the United Nations. On the one
               acting in the use of the seas and in the ex-  which there is an indirect, but unequivo-                           continental shelves extend beyond 200  hand,  it  is  the  end  where  States  parties
               ploitation of their resources.           cal, reference to the IMO. This is primarily                             nautical miles must carry out a topograph-  to UNCLOS express their opinions, nego-
                 When it comes to maritime navigation,  through the expression “competent in-                                    ic study and submit a request to extend  tiate and make decisions, with a view to
               the main institution is the International  ternational organization” (UNCLOS, An-                                 the legal regime of the continental shelf  organizing and controlling activities in the
               Maritime Organization (IMO), which is re-  nex VIII, Art. 1).  As the institution under                           beyond these 200 miles.                  Area. On the other hand, it is more than
                                                                      20
               sponsible for taking care of safety measures  analysis is an international organization                              This delimitation beyond 200 miles  a simple means of collective expression
               in international navigation  and environ-  and has a universal mandate to deal with                               works, in practice, as follows: the coastal  by its members. It is also the organization
               mental  issues  in  the  marine  environment,  issues of maritime safety and pollution, it                        State carries out a study to delimit what it  that represents all of Humanity. 3
               with the slogan: “Safe, secure and efficient  is evident that it is the International Mar-                        understands to be its Continental Shelf, us-  The administration of the Area and its
               shipping on clean oceans” .              itime Organization (VENTURA, 2005) Fur-                                  ing the rules established by the UNCLOS.  resources is the Authority’s second purpose.
                                      19
                 The IMO plays an important role in the  thermore, the UNCLOS speaks of “gen-                                    After that, it is presented to the Continen-  This does not mean that you own a property
               implementation of the United Nations  erally accepted” rules, standards, regula-                                  tal Shelf Limits Commission, composed of  right, but you can only manage the explo-
               Convention on the Law of the Sea (UN-    tions, procedures and practices, which the                               21 members, which will analyze the scien-  ration in this area. To this end, the Author-
               CLOS) of 1982 (BLANCO-BAZÁN, 2000).  doctrine understands to  refer  to norms                                     tific data and vote on the State’s request. If  ity must control all activities carried out in
               There is thus only a single textual mention  and parameters established by the IMO. 21                            a two-thirds qualified majority agrees that  the Area in accordance with the regulations


     216   BLUE ECONOMY                                                                                                                                                      The Regulation of the Sea: Consolidation and Perspectives  217
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223