Page 141 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 141

of resources, as it plays a key global role   the sphere of States and comprise a set   cooperation in accordance with institution-  main objective of global governance is to
 in relations between countries, particularly   of situations in which states and groups   al rules and regulations. Although cooper-  improve the current state of the environ-
 from an economic and geopolitical point   (individuals, NGOs, companies) interact   ation in an anarchic environment can be  ment towards sustainable development
 of view. The Atlantic, particularly in its   are imperative. In order to overcome ocean   difficult, reviews of international relations  (RIBEIRO, 2012; NAJAM, PAPA & TAIYAB,
 southern portion, below the Equator, was   environmental challenges a perspective of   over the last 30 years have shown that co-  2006; YOUNG, 2021).
 the historic stage of European coloniza-  global environmental governance needs to   operation can often be achieved by mak-  However, the future of ocean gover-
 tion with consequent humanitarian disas-  be in place. Global environmental gover-  ing global governance more effective (KE-  nance as a possibility to effectively face the
 ters (BRUNELLE, 2013).  nance occurs through the set of organiza-  OHANE, 1984; KRASNER, 1983; SNIDAL,  serious socio-environmental challenges of
 The ocean is considered fundamental   tions, policy instruments, financing mech-  1993; YOUNG, 2017; 2021).  the 21st century depends on factors that are
 to the global economy. While shipping   anisms, rules, procedures and norms that   The expression “global governance”  related,  but  can  be  classified  as  structural
 supports 90% of the global trade net   regulate global environmental protection   began to be legitimized among research-  and conjunctural for the purpose of inevita-
 volume, there are over 6,000 oil and gas   processes (YOUNG, 2017).  ers and key actors on the political scenario  ble analytical reduction. The structural fac-
 facilities in operation worldwide that sup-  The setup of this global environmen-  since the late 1980s. Global governance  tors include the very notion of governance
 ply 25 to 30 percent of the world’s ener-  tal governance agenda basically aims   stands for the activities that allow institu-  and its diffusion. It has been more difficult
 gy. The global fishing industry generates   to allow cooperation and diplomacy to   tional frameworks by which nation-states  than one could imagine to convince govern-
 jobs for around 180 million people and   be achieved to solve major environmen-  govern the common good without the  ments, international organizations, compa-
 provides a primary source of protein for   tal problems, with a progressive partici-  need for a central governmental entity.  nies, and even civil society, that the solu-
 over 1 billion people (FAO 2020). In ad-  pation of a broader set of stakeholders   Such activities include the contribution of  tion to many of the ocean environmental
 dition, estimates of the economic value   (GONÇALVES, COSTA, 2011). With the   civil society in addition to national gov-  problems cannot be restricted to traditional
 of  traded  and  non-traded  environmental   growing influence of science in diplomat-  ernments  and  international  organizations.  mechanisms of coercion and formal author-
 services (supply of food, oxygen, water   ic decision-making, in particular in ocean   (ROSENAU, CZEMPIEL, 2000; GONÇALVES,  ity. But it is also not about rejecting the tra-
 and climate regulation) sums up to a total   governance, it is essential to understand   COSTA, 2011; YOUNG, 2017).  ditional forms of the exercise of power. The
 of US$21 trillion per year. (CONSTANZA,   the dynamics between research and in-  In addition to the decentralization of  challenge is to incorporate dimensions that
 1999; HALPERN et al., 2012).  ternational relations, a central theme of   power, the sharing of decisions and the  have acquired strategic importance, based
 This magnitude and interdependence   Ocean Science Diplomacy (POLEJACK,   involvement of new non-state actors, such  on institutions and extra-state cooperation
 of different sectors of society demands a   BARROS-PLATIAU,  2020).  In  this  sense,   as supranational powers, the private sector  organizations to make negotiation process-
 global perspective of ocean governance   this chapter seeks to discuss the relevance   and civil society organizations, global gov-  es aimed at building consensus capable of
 to deal with problems that transcend   of scientific cooperation and  science diplo-  ernance faces the challenge of the dizzying  guaranteeing applicability and continuity in
 the limits of sovereignty and geopolitics.   macy to ocean governance and economy,   amplification of issues that are also regu-  space and time more effective.
 Therefore, mechanisms that  are  not in   with a focus on the Brazilian case.  lated at  the  level of multilateral regimes   Science  diplomacy  may  contribute  to
                   and organizations (CHASEK; WAGNER,  this regard, as scientific evidence has  be-
 2. Overview: relevance of the ocean in cooperation and diplomacy  2012). This is the case, for example, of the  come a determining factor in environmen-
                   ocean. There is no core of authority that  tal consensus at the international level. The
 Over the last few decades, internation-  under the United Nations since 1921, and   regulates countries’ activities in the ocean.  scientific  evidence  available  today  both
 al institutions have progressively addressed   more than 90 International Environmental   Instead, what exists is a coordination cen-  points to the planetary limits, within which
 ocean environmental challenges. Over 700   Agreements  since the United Nations Con-  ter represented by the United Nations (UN)  humanity can operate safely, as well as also
 multilateral environmental agreements   ference on the Environment held in Stock-  and its agencies, as well as periodic sum-  discusses innovative solutions in the search
 dealing with ocean challenges are estimat-  holm in 1972 (CHASEK; WAGNER, 2012).   mits between its members. Within the UN,  for a more sustainable planet. In this sense,
 ed (MITCHELL, 2003). In addition, there   These agreements seek to protect and   governance is a form of articulation, not a  science becomes a critical actor in interna-
 are more than 155 agreements registered   recover the environment by stimulating   commanding force. For some scholars, the  tional decision-making processes. Thus, the



 138   BLUE ECONOMY                                                Ocean Governance, Cooperation and Diplomacy  139
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146