Page 140 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês
P. 140

of resources, as it plays a key global role   the sphere of States and comprise a set                             cooperation in accordance with institution-  main objective of global governance is to
               in relations between countries, particularly   of situations in which states and groups                           al rules and regulations. Although cooper-  improve the current state of the environ-
               from an economic and geopolitical point   (individuals, NGOs, companies) interact                                 ation in an anarchic environment can be  ment towards sustainable development
               of view. The Atlantic, particularly in its   are imperative. In order to overcome ocean                           difficult, reviews of international relations  (RIBEIRO, 2012; NAJAM, PAPA & TAIYAB,
               southern portion, below the Equator, was   environmental challenges a perspective of                              over the last 30 years have shown that co-  2006; YOUNG, 2021).
               the historic stage of European coloniza-  global environmental governance needs to                                operation can often be achieved by mak-     However, the future of ocean gover-
               tion with consequent humanitarian disas-  be in place. Global environmental gover-                                ing global governance more effective (KE-  nance as a possibility to effectively face the
               ters (BRUNELLE, 2013).                   nance occurs through the set of organiza-                                OHANE, 1984; KRASNER, 1983; SNIDAL,  serious socio-environmental challenges of
                 The ocean is considered fundamental    tions, policy instruments, financing mech-                               1993; YOUNG, 2017; 2021).                the 21st century depends on factors that are
               to the global economy. While shipping    anisms, rules, procedures and norms that                                    The expression “global governance”  related,  but  can  be  classified  as  structural
               supports 90% of the global trade net     regulate global environmental protection                                 began to be legitimized among research-  and conjunctural for the purpose of inevita-
               volume, there are over 6,000 oil and gas   processes (YOUNG, 2017).                                               ers and key actors on the political scenario  ble analytical reduction. The structural fac-
               facilities in operation worldwide that sup-  The setup of this global environmen-                                 since the late 1980s. Global governance  tors include the very notion of governance
               ply 25 to 30 percent of the world’s ener-  tal governance agenda basically aims                                   stands for the activities that allow institu-  and its diffusion. It has been more difficult
               gy. The global fishing industry generates   to allow cooperation and diplomacy to                                 tional frameworks by which nation-states  than one could imagine to convince govern-
               jobs for around 180 million people and   be achieved to solve major environmen-                                   govern the common good without the  ments, international organizations, compa-
               provides a primary source of protein for   tal problems, with a progressive partici-                              need for a central governmental entity.  nies, and even civil society, that the solu-
               over 1 billion people (FAO 2020). In ad-  pation of a broader set of stakeholders                                 Such activities include the contribution of  tion to many of the ocean environmental
               dition, estimates of the economic value   (GONÇALVES, COSTA, 2011). With the                                      civil society in addition to national gov-  problems cannot be restricted to traditional
               of  traded  and  non-traded  environmental   growing influence of science in diplomat-                            ernments  and  international  organizations.  mechanisms of coercion and formal author-
               services (supply of food, oxygen, water   ic decision-making, in particular in ocean                              (ROSENAU, CZEMPIEL, 2000; GONÇALVES,  ity. But it is also not about rejecting the tra-
               and climate regulation) sums up to a total   governance, it is essential to understand                            COSTA, 2011; YOUNG, 2017).               ditional forms of the exercise of power. The
               of US$21 trillion per year. (CONSTANZA,   the dynamics between research and in-                                      In addition to the decentralization of  challenge is to incorporate dimensions that
               1999; HALPERN et al., 2012).             ternational relations, a central theme of                                power, the sharing of decisions and the  have acquired strategic importance, based
                 This magnitude and interdependence     Ocean Science Diplomacy (POLEJACK,                                       involvement of new non-state actors, such  on institutions and extra-state cooperation
               of different sectors of society demands a   BARROS-PLATIAU,  2020).  In  this  sense,                             as supranational powers, the private sector  organizations to make negotiation process-
               global perspective of ocean governance   this chapter seeks to discuss the relevance                              and civil society organizations, global gov-  es aimed at building consensus capable of
               to deal with problems that transcend     of scientific cooperation and  science diplo-                            ernance faces the challenge of the dizzying  guaranteeing applicability and continuity in
               the limits of sovereignty and geopolitics.   macy to ocean governance and economy,                                amplification of issues that are also regu-  space and time more effective.
               Therefore, mechanisms that  are  not in   with a focus on the Brazilian case.                                     lated at  the  level of multilateral regimes   Science  diplomacy  may  contribute  to
                                                                                                                                 and organizations (CHASEK; WAGNER,  this regard, as scientific evidence has  be-
              2. Overview: relevance of the ocean in cooperation and diplomacy                                                   2012). This is the case, for example, of the  come a determining factor in environmen-
                                                                                                                                 ocean. There is no core of authority that  tal consensus at the international level. The
                 Over the last few decades, internation-  under the United Nations since 1921, and                               regulates countries’ activities in the ocean.  scientific  evidence  available  today  both
               al institutions have progressively addressed   more than 90 International Environmental                           Instead, what exists is a coordination cen-  points to the planetary limits, within which
               ocean environmental challenges. Over 700   Agreements  since the United Nations Con-                              ter represented by the United Nations (UN)  humanity can operate safely, as well as also
               multilateral environmental agreements    ference on the Environment held in Stock-                                and its agencies, as well as periodic sum-  discusses innovative solutions in the search
               dealing with ocean challenges are estimat-  holm in 1972 (CHASEK; WAGNER, 2012).                                  mits between its members. Within the UN,  for a more sustainable planet. In this sense,
               ed (MITCHELL, 2003). In addition, there   These agreements seek to protect and                                    governance is a form of articulation, not a  science becomes a critical actor in interna-
               are more than 155 agreements registered   recover the environment by stimulating                                  commanding force. For some scholars, the  tional decision-making processes. Thus, the



     138   BLUE ECONOMY                                                                                                                                                           Ocean Governance, Cooperation and Diplomacy  139
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145