Page 131 - Economia Azul - versão: inglês

policies are produced with the presence of 3. To identify national priorities, includ- tors in decision-making on the production with multiple actors, complementing Federal
a great diversity of actors and, therefore, ing the development of Decade programs; of public policies and in the delivery of pub- regulation. Cesar, Luna, and Perkins (2020)
with different points of view on the prob- 4. To coordinate national dissemination lic services via implementation. And, final- also present a promising research agenda
lems, causes and solutions. and communication activities; ly, it would be directly related to networks, with the approach of commons, analyzing
Understanding governance from the 5. To facilitate the provision of necessary with the growth of civil society acting in the effectiveness of regulation from the vari-
actor level highlights the different percep- national support; networks. This entire framework is linked to ables of community leaders and their perfor-
tions among actors, their divergences and 6. To encourage voluntary contributions the concept of “new governance”, as char- mance in enforcing the regulation itself, as
consensus, as well as the strategies used to international calls; acteristics that refer to ideal types linked to well as local conflicts and the relationship be-
by actors in the face of the uncertainties 7. To provide reports to the Decade Co- concepts of democracy (BEVIR, 2010). tween environmental and land policy.
of the iterative interactive process. The gov- ordination Unit; and The objective would thus be identifying It is possible to analyze, within the scope
ernance process for solving complex prob- 8. To facilitate the realization of region- the citizens participating in the discussion, of different governance themes, how the
lems demands alternatives beyond individ- al or international meetings related to the the deliberation arenas within the scope of principles of “good” regulation, observed
ual organizational competencies, which are Decade. the governance of the sea, noting through by Ostrom (1990), apply: clearly defined
collaborative, systemic and adaptive. which arenas and in what way. Thus: what limits; rules of appropriation and provision
The intersectoral governance of the Vertical/Multi-Level Governance is the level of involvement of actors in de- consistent with local conditions; collec-
Decade of Ocean Science is based on a (Meta-Governance) cision-making processes? Is there effective tive choice arrangements; monitoring and
balanced representation in the Advisory participation? Do the citizens who partic- control; sanctions; mechanisms for conflict
Committee of the Decade of Ocean Sci- Multilevel governance refers to the one ipate in the environmental councils at the resolution;rights of organizations and net-
ence, formalized through MCTI Ordinance that integrates the Central State at the local three federal levels have any profile match- work of institutions.
No. 4,534 of March 8, 2021, which is com- level of delivery of public goods and services, es? How do they differ? And how they dif- It is also possible to analyze with the In-
posed by: Ministry of Science, Technology or even between this and the international fer in the other environmental arenas? And stitutional Analysis and Development (IAD)
and Innovations; Brazil’s Navy; National level. In this sense, discussions on federal- what is the relationship of these arenas approach, based on Ostrom’s conceptions
Council for Scientific and Technological ism and governance are relevant here from with the sectoral and local Councils and (CAPELARI; CALMON; ARAÚJO, 2017),
Development (CNPq); Brazilian Institute the perspective of the distribution of com- Committees? These questions are part of a how the institutional framework nestles in
of Information in Science and Technology petences related to regulatory and executive wider research agenda. the municipal, state and federal multilevels,
(IBICT); UNESCO BRAZIL; 2 representatives decision-making (ARRETCHE, 2012). Another research agenda for the gover- seeking the advantages and disadvantages
of Civil Society; 3 representatives of the The governance theme refers more to nance of the sea is possible with the com- of each configuration. In this sense, there
Academy: Brazilian Academy of Scienc- process than to institutions, more to practic- mons management approach proposed by are variables to be observed: the nature and
es and two Researchers; 1 private sector es, organization, and coordination, indepen- Ostrom (1990). The exploration and man- quality of the rules, their relevance to the
representative; 2 Youth Ambassador rep- dent or going beyond the State. It thus brings agement of the environment allows an ag- community and ecosystems, and the en-
resentatives and 2 Scientific Dissemination the possibility for social organizations to act gregate analysis of management arrange- forcement and legitimacy of the institutional
representatives. The Committee’s compe- more independently from the State. The first ments and instruments, which generally act framework in question.
tencies are: sign of governance would therefore be the within the institutional framework of gov- Applied to the case of governance of
overcoming of an extremely bureaucratic ernance instruments, such as Commissions. the sea, studies with the IAD approach on
1. To connect the Decade framework and hierarchical vision, with a State acting The case of basin management committees, local ecosystem conditions, the local, state,
to the national science and the community more with market relations, contracts, and for example, can provide a case for the de- and federal institutional framework and the
that produces knowledge; networks. The second sign would be related bate on examples of autonomous regulation attributes of the local community support
2. To provide national inputs for the for- to the multilevel nature in trying to solve of natural assets of common goods by local an analysis of the challenges of governance
mulation of Decade Actions among stake- problems together. A third sign would be communities. In general, these resource solu- and the interaction between all stakehold-
holder groups and/or nations; related to the involvement of non-state ac- tions have characteristics of local regulation ers on a multilevel scale.

128 BLUE ECONOMY Sea Governance in the Decade of Ocean Science 129